


RUMOUR | 2009/2010 NHL Statistics | 2010 Cap Hit | |||||
To New York | Position | Age | GP | Goals | Points | Years | Per Year |
Vincent Lecavalier | Forward | 29 | 48 | 12 | 46 | 11 | $7.727 million |
-------- | |||||||
To Tampa Bay | Position | Age | GP | Goals | Points | Years | Per Year |
Brandon Dubinsky | Forward | 23 | 36 | 10 | 26 | 2 | $1.85 million |
Wade Redden | Defenseman | 32 | 42 | 1 | 7 | 5 | $6.5 million |
Matt Gilroy | Defenseman | 25 | 44 | 4 | 7 | 2 | $1.75 million |

From the Tampa Bay side, they have been in the middle of the Vincent Lecavalier rumour cloud for quite some time now and in some cases there might be some fire to all the smoke. It does seem awfully silly to be thinking about a move for Lecavalier, the face of the franchise, but the mistake of giving him a boat load on a very long-term deal does seem to be biting the team management in the ass a little bit. We all know that trying to move a cap hit over $7 million is one of the hardest things plaguing some NHL general managers these days.
The Rangers know all too well about trying to move a big cap hit and this proposed rumour has that individual case in this deal going back the other way. Wade Redden and his $6.5 million cap hit has been a plight upon Rangers management, especially with the lack of decent play from the blueliner. I can see what the writer of this proposed rumour was thinking... "let's swap the big contracts and then give the Lightning a little bit more, because they are taking on Redden." I can see it, it makes some sense, but for the Lightning its somewhat of a dumb move, especially since they wouldn't be getting anywhere near the offense from Brandon Dubinsky and their depth gets challenged a bit more.

I still don't know why the Lightning would trade Lecavalier away until Steven Stamkos is up for negotiations and the team feels they want him more than Lecavalier.
Plus, I truly believe that the Rangers are stuck with Redden for the duration of that deal.
No comments:
Post a Comment